Issue - meetings

FP1147 M&E Contracts

Meeting: 31/10/2022 - Cabinet (Item 49)

49 Award of Contract - Mechanical and Electrical Contracts (Forward Plan Reference FP1147) pdf icon PDF 132 KB

Report of the Service Director (Property Maintenance and Climate Change) on the appointment of a contractor for mechanical and electrical services.

Additional documents:

Decision:

(1)   Cabinet agreed to award the contract for M&E Services to RGE Services Limited for a three year period with a possible extension of up to two years, commencing on 1 April 2023.

 

(2)   The award is, subject to conclusion of the 30 day leaseholder engagement period under Section 20 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 (and regard being had of any representations) and subject to the expiry of the mandatory standstill period.

Minutes:

Report of the Service Director (Property Maintenance and Climate Change) on the appointment of a contractor for mechanical and electrical services.

 

(1)         The Decision Taken

 

RESOLVED:

(unanimous)

 

(1)  Cabinet agreed to award the contract for M&E Services to RGE Services Limited for a three year period with a possible extension of up to two years, commencing on 1 April 2023.

 

(2)  The award is, subject to conclusion of the 30 day leaseholder engagement period under Section 20 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 (and regard being had of any representations) and subject to the expiry of the mandatory standstill period.

 

(2)        Reasons for the Decision

 

The report set out a recommendation to appoint RGE Services Ltd to deliver mechanical and electrical services.

 

Services have been combined under one new contract to deliver Door Entry Installation Maintenance, Fire Alarm Maintenance and Communal Mechanical & Electrical Works.

 

The project had been procured in accordance with the Council’s Contract Procedure Rules and Public Contracts Regulations 2015. Seven bids were received and RGE Services Ltd were the highest scoring bidder.

 

(Note: Cabinet agreed both the Part 1 and Part 2 decision for this item so a confidential discussion in Part 2 was not needed).