Venue: Council Chamber, Council Offices, The Campus, Welwyn Garden City, AL8 6AE
Contact: Democratic Services
Media
Items
No. |
Item |
27. |
APOLOGIES & SUBSTITUTIONS
To note any substitution of Committee Members
in accordance with Council Procedure Rules 19 -22.
Additional documents:
Minutes:
Apologies for absence were received from
Councillors K Bonkur, H Goldwater, B Sarson and R Trigg.
The following substitution of members was made
in accordance with Council Procedure Rules:
Cllr Alex Bardett for Cllr B
Sarson
Cllr L Chesterman for Cllr K Bonkur
Cllr M Short for Cllr R Trigg
Cllr S Bonfante for Cllr H Goldwater.
|
28. |
MINUTES
To confirm as a correct record the Minutes of
the meeting held on 22 August 2024 (previously circulated).
Additional documents:
Minutes:
The minutes of the meeting held on 22 August
2024 were approved as a correct record.
|
29. |
NOTIFICATION OF URGENT BUSINESS TO BE CONSIDERED UNDER ITEM 6
Additional documents:
Minutes:
There were no items of urgent business.
|
30. |
DECLARATIONS OF INTERESTS BY MEMBERS
To note declarations of Members’
disclosable pecuniary interests, non-disclosable pecuniary
interests and non-pecuniary interests in respect of items on the
Agenda.
Additional documents:
Minutes:
There were no declarations of interest.
|
31. |
GAMBLING ACT POLICY PDF 195 KB
To receive a report of the Executive Director
(Resident Services and Climate Change) on the Gambling Act
Policy.
Additional documents:
Minutes:
The Licensing Team Leader introduced the
report. Section 349 of the Gambling Act required all licensing
authorities to prepare and publish a statement of the principles
that they proposed to apply in exercising their functions under the
Act during the three year period to which the policy applied
(January 2025 – 2028). The statement must be produced
following consultation. The draft revised policy was consulted on
for 12 weeks between June and September 2024 and five responses
were received which were included in Appendix 3 of the report.
One of the responses received was from
Hatfield Town Council which was generally in support of the
policy.
Hertfordshire County Council (HCC) had raised
three points:
- It was launching a Gambling Harms
strategy at the end of 2024; one of its proposed strategic
priorities was about influencing the licensing and regulatory
environment to protect vulnerable people from gambling harm and to
be clear on the individual roles of the County Council and district
and borough councils. The Hertfordshire Joint Needs Assessment
Briefing in 2022 provided a wealth of evidence which was
recommended to be referenced in the Gambling Statement of
Principles. Members were asked whether they would like to reference
this in the Welwyn Hatfield Gambling Act policy; premises were
required to produce a risk assessment and to have procedures and
measures in place to mitigate risk. Members voted unanimously that
the policy would reference the joint needs assessment on
gambling.
- HCC had made specific comments
relating to the harm caused by problem gambling and the impact of
applications locally to protect children and vulnerable people from
being harmed or exploited by gambling. Hertfordshire Public Health
recommended that the policy statement should reference the
cumulative impact of applications locally. Cumulative impact was
not mentioned in the Gambling Act and so if this was to be
considered, it should be on the basis of evidence that the Gambling
Act objectives were being locally undermined. This could
potentially be unjustified as there was a low number of
establishments in the borough (15) and neither the Council or
police had any concerns. Members were asked whether they wished the
policy to reference cumulative impact. A member asked where the
line would be drawn (i.e. what was the maximum number of premises
acceptable for a location) and officers responded that legislation
meant a gambling licence could only be refused with good reason:
establishments needed a licence from the Gambling Commission, to
complete a risk assessment that took account of the Council’s
policy and local area profile, and to be licensed by the Council.
The only grounds for which an application could be refused was if
an establishment failed to meet the relevant criteria. If there
were concerns about an excess of premises in a location, the
establishment would be asked in its risk assessment and application
to focus on how it would be protecting the relevant criteria.
Cumulative impact could be revisited at any time if it became an
issue. A member asked what would be ...
view the full minutes text for item 31.
|